4.7 Article

Phytochemical compositions, and antioxidant properties, and antiproliferative activities of wheat flour

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages 325-331

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.141

Keywords

Wheat flour; Total phenolic content; Ferulic acid; Carotenoids; Tocopherols; Antiproliferation

Funding

  1. Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (JIFSAN)
  2. Maryland Grain Producers Utilisation Board (MGPUB)
  3. SJTU 985-III disciplines' platform and talent funds [TS0414115001, TS0320215001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ten soft wheat varieties grown in Maryland were compared for their phytochemical compositions, antioxidant properties and antiproliferative activities. Free radical scavenging capacities were examined against DPPH., oxygen, hydroxyl and ABTS(.+) radicals. Significant radical scavenging capacities were detected in all wheat flour extracts. Total phenolic content ranged from 1.66 to 2.01 mg of GAE/g wheat flour. The wheat flours contained 172.91-297.55 mu g/g insoluble bound ferulic acid, contributing 89.74-94.29% of total ferulic acid on a per weight basis. The concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin were 0.27-0.46 and 0.08-0.13 mu g/g, respectively. In addition, the wheat flours had 0.30-0.59 and 0.07-0.29 mu g/g alpha- and delta-tocopherols, respectively. Four wheat flour extracts were further examined for their antiproliferative activities. The Jamestown wheat flour showed significant antiproliferative activity against both HT-29 and Caco-2 colon cancer cells at the initial treatment concentration of 50 mg flour equivalents/ml, while USG3555 flour showed inhibitive effect only in HT-29 cancer cells, suggesting the different and possible selective antiproliferative property of the wheat flours. These results may be used to direct the breeding effects to produce soft winter wheat varieties with improved health properties. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available