4.7 Article

Physicochemical and antioxidative properties of red and black rice varieties from Thailand, China and Sri Lanka

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages 132-140

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.115

Keywords

Coloured rice; Black rice; Red rice; Physicochemical properties; Anthocyanins; Phenolic compounds; Antioxidant capacity

Funding

  1. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna
  2. Royal Thai Government, Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nine red and three black rice varieties from Thailand, China and Sri Lanka were analysed to determine their proximate composition and their physicochemical and antioxidant properties. Four groups of rice varieties with different amylose contents were identified. Cyanidin 3-glucoside and peonoidin 3-glucoside were confirmed as the dominant anthocyanins in black rice varieties with contents ranging from 19.4 to 140.8 mg/100 g DM and 11.1-12.8 mg/100 g DM, respectively. Total phenolic content (TPC) differed significantly between the varieties, but not between the colours. Highest TPC was found in the red Thai rice Bahng Gawk (BC) with 691 FA equivalent mg/100 g DM, which showed as well the highest antioxidant properties. In red varieties, the major phenolic acids in the free form were ferulic, protocatechuic and vanillic acid, whereas in black varieties protocatechuic acid was dominant followed by vanillic and ferulic acid. In the bound form, ferulic acid was predominant in both colours, where contents differed significantly, followed by p-coumaric and vanillic acid. The antioxidative capacity did not differ significantly between both colours but amongst genotypes. Antioxidant capacity of rice varieties ranged within 0.9-8.1 mmol Fe(II)/100 g DM for FRAP and 2.1-12.3 mmol TEAC/100 g DM. DPPH scavenging ability ranged from 13.0% to 76.4% remaining DPPH. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available