4.7 Article

Plasma glycomics predict cardiovascular disease in patients with ART-controlled HIV infections

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 1852-1859

Publisher

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201800923R

Keywords

biomarker; glycan; glycome; lectin; CVD

Funding

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM082916, GM115234]
  2. NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Training Grant [T32 AI089474]
  3. CWRU CFAR grant [AI036219]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite effective control of HIV infection with antiretroviral drugs, individuals with HIV have high incidences of secondary diseases. These sequelae, such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), are poorly understood and represent a major health burden. To date, predictive biomarkers of HIV-associated secondary disease have been elusive, making preventative clinical management essentially impossible. Here, we applied a newly developed and easy to deploy, multitarget, and high-throughput glycomic analysis to banked HIV+ human plasma samples to determine whether the glycome may include biomarkers that predict future HIV-associated cardiovascular events or CVD diagnoses. Using 324 patient samples, we identified a glycomic fingerprint that was predictive of future CVD events but independent of CD4 counts, diabetes, age, and birth sex, suggesting that the plasma glycome may serve as a biomarker for specific HIV-associated sequelae. Our findings constitute the discovery of novel glycan biomarkers that could classify patients with HIV with elevated risk for CVD and reveal the untapped prognostic potential of the plasma glycome in human disease.Oswald, D. M., Sim, E. S., Baker, C., Farhan, O., Debanne, S. M., Morris, N. J., Rodriguez, B. G., Jones, M. B., Cobb, B. A. Plasma glycomics predict cardiovascular disease in patients with ART-controlled HIV infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available