4.5 Review

Emerging therapeutic interventions for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 893-910

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2014.913569

Keywords

anti-fibrotic agents; apoptosis; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; inflammation; pulmonary fibrosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating and relentlessly progressive lung disorder. Previously, it was thought to be a chronic inflammatory disease; however, it is now considered to be an epithelial-fibroblastic disease. In accordance with this paradigm change, efforts toward the development of novel therapeutic targets for IPF have acquired a new direction. Currently available therapies are largely ineffective in reversing the lung damage, and lung transplantation is the only effective treatment for end-stage disease. Limitations in advancement of IPF therapeutics are due to a poor understanding of its pathogenesis, unavailability of reliable animal models and slow disease progression. Recent research on IPF has resulted in the identification of a plethora of novel targets that are in various stages of development and offers hope that in the near future that there will be better therapeutic options available for the treatment of IPF. Areas covered: This review discusses existing therapies and highlights some of the recent, novel therapeutics being explored in the current clinical landscape for the treatment of this chronic, disabling disorder. The review also discusses the pathogenic rationale behind current therapies. Expert opinion: Targeting one fibrotic signaling pathway at a time may not have any significant effect on the control of IPF. It is therefore recommended that future IPF management focuses on targeting multiple pro-fibrotic pathways associated with its complex pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available