4.5 Article

Clinical usefulness of the visibility of the transcerebral veins at 3T on T2*-weighted sequence in acute stroke patients

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages 1282-1287

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.025

Keywords

Stroke; MRI; T2*imaging

Funding

  1. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique EVAL-USINV [AOM 03 008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The objective of this work was to investigate the clinical usefulness of the visibility of the transcerebral veins (VTV) in acute ischemic stroke patients at 3 T. Methods: Sixty consecutive carotid artery territory stroke patients were included retrospectively. Two readers categorized the VTV on T2*-weighted sequence at 3 T for each hemisphere, and asymmetry of this sign was assessed between each hemisphere by an asymmetry index (AI) using a three-item scale. The VTV and AI were correlated with clinical and radiological covariates. Particular interest was focused on patients for whom initial diffusion-weighted imaging alone was inconclusive. Results: VTV were detected in the stroke hemisphere in 58.3% (n = 35) and in the contralateral side in 10% (n = 6, p < 0.0001). Asymmetry of the VTV between ischemic and contralateral hemispheres was present in 53.3% (n = 32). Intracranial artery occlusion, final infarct volume and symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation were correlated with a higher AI at baseline (rho = 0.563, rho = 0.291, and rho = 0.285, p < 0.05, respectively). Three hyperacute stroke patients with subtle DWI high signal intensity at admission demonstrated VTV. Conclusions: The pathological value of the VTV seems to reside in its asymmetry between hemispheres, as it was correlated with important clinical parameters. This study also suggests that the VTV could be a supportive finding in stroke diagnosis, especially when DWI is unreliable. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available