4.5 Article

MR-based semi-automated quantification of renal functional parameters with a two-compartment model - An interobserver analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 59-65

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.10.005

Keywords

functional renal imaging; magnetic resonance; renal perfusion; interobserver agreement; 3 T

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To assess the interobserver agreement in a semi-automated quantification approach of MR-renal perfusion and filtration parameters with a two-compartment model analysis. Materials and methods: Twelve consecutive patients underwent renal perfusion measurements after intravenous injection of 7 ml Gd-BOPTA at 4 ml/s at 3.0 T. Two independent observers placed two regions of interest (ROI) manually on the axial slice, one in the abdominal aorta to determine the arterial input function (AIF), and one at the tissue-air interface for retrospective triggering. The data were fitted on a pixel-by-pixel basis to the two-compartment model, producing maps of the per-fusion parameters F-p (plasma flow), T-p (plasma mean transit time) and of the tubular filtration parameters F-T (tubular flow) and T-T (tubular mean transit time). A cortical ROI was segmented by selecting those pixels with plasma volume V-p > 10 ml/100 ml, and the model fit was repeated on a ROI basis to produce the cortical averages. Results: The average values (observer 1/observer 2) were F-p (226.2/187.3 ml/100 ml/min), T-p (9.0/9.1 s), F-T (23.5/20.8 ml/100 mi/min), T-T (142.1/140.0 s). The correlation coefficients between both observers were 0.90 (Fp), 0.80 (T-p), 0.80 (F-T), 0.78 (T-T). Correlations of all values were significant (p < 0.05). A paired t-test yielded significant differences for Fp (P = 0.004). Discussion/conclusion: The data demonstrate a significant systematic difference for the parameter F-p, while T-p seems to be most stable. Further decrease of the residual variability of all parameters seems desirable to improve the robustness of the method for clinical routine. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available