4.5 Article

Impact of different bone marrow cell preparations remodelling after experimental myocardial on left ventricular infarction

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 119-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2007.11.009

Keywords

myocardial infarction; remodelling; BM cell injection; cytokine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Bone marrow (BM)-derived haematopoietic stem cells have been proposed as a potential cell source to functionally engraft the myocardium and to improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI). However, experimental and clinical data are inconsistent. Since the specific characteristics of different BM cell subsets could influence their therapeutic potential we determined the effect of different BM cell populations on left ventricular remodelling after MI. Methods and results: MI was induced in female mice by coronary artery ligation. Surviving mice were randomised to receive either: total BM, mature Lin(+) or primitive Lin(-) cells from male mice, or saline, via intracardiac injection. Injected cells were detected in the infarct and border zone by PCR for Y-chromosomal sequences. Serial transthoracic echocardiography was performed 1, 2 1, and 42 days after MI. Over a period of 6 weeks, mortality was not different between the groups. After MI, animals exhibited left ventricular dilatation, as expected. Left ventricular remodelling was not influenced by Lin(+) or Lin(-) BM cells but was partially improved by unfractionated BM cell injection. Paracrine secretion of cytokines (e.g. IL-6, GM-CSF) was differentially regulated in supernatants of cultured BM cells. Summary: Treatment with unfractionated BM cells, but not Lin(+), or Lin(-) cells partially improved cardiac remodelling and function after MI. This may be mediated by paracrine effects. (C) 2007 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available