4.2 Article

Lambda-Cyhalothrin Nanosuspension Prepared by the Melt Emulsification-High Pressure Homogenization Method

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOMATERIALS
Volume 2015, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2015/123496

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Major National Scientific Research Program of China [2014CB932200]
  2. Basic Scientific Research Foundation of National Non-Profit Scientific Institute of China [BSRF201406]
  3. National 863 program of the People's Republic of China [2011AA10A201]
  4. 12th Five-Year Plan Project of Science and Technology Support of China [2014BAD14B02, 2013BAC09B01]
  5. Research and Development of Industrial Technology Special at Jilin Provincial Development and Reform Commission [2013C001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nanosuspension of 5% lambda-cyhalothrin with 0.2% surfactants was prepared by the melt emulsification-high pressure homogenization method. The surfactants composition, content, and homogenization process were optimized. The anionic surfactant (1-dodecanesulfonic acid sodium salt) and polymeric surfactant (maleic rosin-polyoxypropylene-polyoxyethylene ether sulfonate) screened from 12 types of commercially common-used surfactants were used to prepare lambda-cyhalothrin nanosuspension with high dispersity and stability. The mean particle size and polydispersity index of the nanosuspension were 16.01 +/- 0.11 nm and 0.266 +/- 0.002, respectively. The high zeta potential value of -41.7 +/- 1.3mV and stable crystalline state of the nanoparticles indicated the excellent physical and chemical stability. The method could be widely used for preparing nanosuspension of various pesticides with melting points below boiling point of water. This formulation may avoid the use of organic solvents and reduce surfactants and is perspective for improving bioavailability and reducing residual pollution of pesticide in agricultural products and environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available