3.9 Article

Living With Difference: Experiences of Adolescent Girls With Cleft Lip and Palate

Journal

CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages E27-E34

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1597/10-278

Keywords

adolescents; cleft lip and palate; craniofacial; orthognathic surgery; qualitative research; social stigma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study explored the experiences of adolescent girls with cleft lip and palate who were preparing for orthognathic surgery. Design: A qualitative study, based on a phenomenological approach, explored adolescents' experiences. Two 1-hour semistructured interviews were conducted before surgery, and member checking was employed to verify findings with each participant. Setting: A tertiary care pediatric hospital in central Canada. Participants: A criterion sampling technique was used to recruit a sample of seven participants with cleft lip and palate ranging in age from 15 to 20 years who were scheduled for cleft orthognathic surgery. Results: Participants described experiencing teasing, bullying, and stares. In many cases, participants sought to resist and dismiss negative social attitudes about their visible difference while working to combat this with a positive view of who they really are. To varying degrees, participants felt constricted in engaging in the community as they were worried what others thought of their visible difference. They worked at finding ways to reduce the impact of social stigma through coping strategies, social supports, and reconstructive surgery. Conclusions: Adolescent girls can experience strain associated with living with a facial difference; however, they find strategies to cope with the perception of difference. Reconstructive surgery is viewed as a means to increase confidence. Further intervention is needed in understanding and addressing stigma and fostering resiliency related to female adolescents living with a facial difference.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available