4.1 Article

Protein beverages containing anthocyanins of jabuticaba

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 112-119

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA CIENCIA TECNOLOGIA ALIMENTOS
DOI: 10.1590/fst.27917

Keywords

whey proteins; phenolic compounds; antioxidants; skins of jabuticaba; Plinia cauliflora

Funding

  1. Research Support Foundation of the State of Minas Gerais-Brazil (FAPEMIG)
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to develop, characterize and evaluate the stability of whey protein beverages containing anthocyanins from jabuticaba skins. Beverage formulations containing 0.5% (F1), 2.0% (F2), 4.0% (F3) and 6.0% (F4) of whey proteins and 2.0 mL of the concentrated phenolic extract from jabuticaba skins were developed. Physicochemical parameters (pH, acidity, total soluble solids, protein content, viscosity, color), antioxidant capacity, total anthocyanins and total phenols of the beverages were determined. In addition, a sensory acceptance test and a stability study were performed. The physicochemical analyses indicated that the protein concentration significantly (p < 0.05) affected the values of acidity, total soluble solids, total phenols and antioxidant capacity. The protein content also influenced the total color difference (Delta E) between formulations. The greater differences were observed in the formulation pairs containing low and high protein contents. The formulations F1, F2 and F3 were equally accepted on overall impression and color attributes. The stability study demonstrated that there was no significant change (p > 0.05) in the total anthocyanins and in the physicochemical properties of F3 over storage time, which indicated a good stability and a great market potential of the whey protein beverages containing anthocyanins from jabuticaba skins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available