4.5 Article

Morphology Control of Bi2S3 Nanostructures and the Formation Mechanism

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 752-756

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.201300006

Keywords

bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3); hydrothermal; nanorod; nanoplate; thermoelectric material

Funding

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2009-0093823]
  2. Pioneer Research Center Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2010-0019313]
  3. Nano-Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [20110030147]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea
  6. Korean Government [20120000651]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bismuthinite (Bi2S3) nanostructures were prepared by a hydrothermal method with sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA-Na2). The morphology of Bi2S3 nanostructures was changed from a nanorod to a nanoplate by presence of the EDTA-Na2. The altered morphology was caused by the capping effect of EDTA-Na2 with Bi3+ ions, which induces the suboptimal growth direction due to partially blocking the preferential orientation direction. When the EDTA-Na2/Bi3+ molar ratio=1, the growth of Bi2S3 nanostructures was not allowed due to the chelating effect of EDTA-Na2. The obtained Bi2S3 nanorods, stacked nanorods, nanoplates and nanoparticles were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern. A possible formation mechanism of these morphologies was proposed. The successful synthesis of various morphologies of nanostructured Bi2S3 may open up new possibilities for thermoelectric, electronic and optoelectronic uses of nanodevices based on Bi2S3 nanostructure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available