4.5 Article

Effect of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 on Toll-like receptors 2-, 3-and 4-triggered expression of IL-6, IL-8 and CXCL10 in human gingival fibroblasts

Journal

CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 264, Issue 1, Pages 104-109

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.05.005

Keywords

Innate immunity; Antimicrobial peptide; Toll-like receptor; LL-37; Gingival fibroblasts; Lipopolysaccharide

Funding

  1. Miyata Science Research Foundation in Asahi University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The antimicrobial peptide LL-37 is known to have a potent LPS-neutralizing activity in monocytes and macrophages. Recently, LL-37 in gingival crevicular fluids is suggested to be the major protective factor preventing infection of periodontogenic pathogens. In this study, we tried to address the effect of LL-37 on proinflammatory responses of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) stimulated with Toll-like receptor (TLR)-stimulant microbial compounds. LL-37 potently suppressed LPS-induced gene expression of IL6, IL8 and CXCL10 and intracellular signaling events, degradation of IRAK-1 and I kappa B alpha and phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and IRF3, indicating that the LPS-neutralizing activity is also exerted in HGFs. LL-37 also suppressed the expression of IL6, IL8 and CXCL10 induced by the TLR3 ligand poly(I:C). LL-37 modestly attenuated the expression of IL6 and IL8 induced by the TLR2/TLR1 ligand Pam(3)CSK(4), but did not affect the expression induced by the TLR2/TLR6 ligand MALP-2. Interestingly, LL-37 rather upregulated the expression of IL6, IL8 and CXCL10 induced by another TLR2/TLR6 ligand FSL-1. Thus, the regulatory effect of LL-37 is differently exerted towards proinflammatory responses of HGFs induced by different microbial stimuli, which may lead to unbalanced proinflammatory responses of the gingival tissue to infection of oral microbes. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available