4.7 Article

In vitro genotoxicity tests point to an unexpected and harmful effect of a Magnolia and Aristolochia association

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages 178-186

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.07.045

Keywords

Aristolochic acid nephropathy; Aristolochia species; Magnolia species; Genotoxicity; gamma-H2AX detection

Funding

  1. University of Mons (UMONS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ethnopharmacological relevance: in the 1990s, a Belgian cohort of more than 100 patients reported cases of Aristolochic Acid Nephropathy (AAN). This progressive renal and interstitial fibrosis, frequently associated with urothelial malignancies, was consecutive to the Chinese-herbs based slimming capsules intake where a plant Stephania tetrandra S. Moore was replaced by a highly genotoxic Aristolochia species. 70% of the Belgian patients evolved into end-stage renal disease, requiring dialysis or renal transplantation. Furthermore the prevalence of upper urinary tract carcinoma was found alarmingly high in these patients. The Aristolochia adulteration was blamed for the intoxication cases and, to the best of our knowledge, the prescription itself has not been further investigated. Aim of the study: This work proposes to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Aristolochia and Magnolia traditional aqueous decoctions and their association. Materials and methods: The cytotoxicity of extracts has been assessed by a MTT cell proliferation assay and the genotoxicity by measuring the presence of gamma-H2AX, a phosphorylated histone associated with DNA damages. Results: Treating cells for 24 h with a mixture 1:1 of Magnolia officinalis and Aristolochia baetica decoctions led to an increase in the production of gamma-H2AX. Conclusions: This genotoxic potentiation warrants further studies but may lead to an explanatory factor for the Chinese herb nephropathy cases. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available