4.4 Article

Effects of the Ionization in the Tautomerism of Uracil: A Reaction Electronic Flux Perspective

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 36, Issue 28, Pages 2135-2145

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24054

Keywords

uracil; hydrogen transfer; tautomerism; density functional theory (DFT); electronic reaction flux; acidity and basicity

Funding

  1. FONDECYT [1141098, 1130072]
  2. ICM [120082]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain) [CTQ2012-35513-C02-01, CTQ2013-43698-P]
  4. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid [FOTOCARBON-CM S2013/MIT-2841 STSM COST: Action CM1204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The one-step tautomerization processes of uracil and its radical cation and radical anion have been investigated in the light of the reaction force and reaction electronic flux (REF) formalisms. The relative energies of the different tautomers as well as the corresponding tautomerization barriers have been obtained through the use of the G4 high-level ab initio method and by means of B3LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p)//B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) calculations. Systematically, the enol radical cations are more stable in relative terms than the neutral, due to the higher ionization energy of the diketo forms with respect to the enolic ones. Conversely, the enol radical anions, with the only exception of the 2-keto-N1 anion, are found to be less stable than the neutral. The effects of the ionization are also sizable on the tautomerization barriers although this effect also depends on the particular tautomerization process. The reaction force analysis shows that all reactions are mainly activated through structural rearrangements that initiate the electronic activity. This electronic activity is monitored along the reaction coordinate through the REF that obeys a delicate balance between the acid and basic character of the atoms involved in the hydrogen transfer. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available