4.8 Article

Absolute Quantitation of Intact Recombinant Antibody Product Variants Using Mass Spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 87, Issue 20, Pages 10475-10482

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02627

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate and precise quantitative measurement of product-related variants of a therapeutic antibody is essential for product development and testing. Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are Abs composed of two different half antibody arms, each of which recognizes a distinct target, and recently they have attracted substantial therapeutic interest. Because of the increased complexity of its structure and its production process, as compared to a conventional monoclonal antibody, additional product-related variants, including covalent and noncovalent homodimers of half antibodies (hAbs), may be present in the bsAb product. Sufficient separation and reliable quantitation of these bsAb homodimers using liquid chromatography (LC) or capillary electrophoresis-based methods is challenging because these homodimer species and the bsAb often have similar physicochemical properties. Formation of noncovalent homodimers and heterodimers can also occur. In addition, since homodimers share common sequences with their corresponding halves and bsAb, it is not suitable to use peptides as surrogates for their quantitation. To tackle these analytical challenges, we developed a mass spectrometry-based quantitation method. Chip-based nanoflow LC time-of-flight mass spectrometry coupled with a standard addition approach provided unbiased absolute quantitation of these drug-product-related variants. Two methods for the addition of known levels of standard (multi- or single-addition) were evaluated. Both methods demonstrated accurate and reproducible quantitation of homodimers at the 0.2% (w/w) level, with the single-addition method having the promise of higher analytical throughput.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available