4.8 Article

Assignment of Core versus Antenna Fucosylation Types in Protein N-Glycosylation via Procainamide Labeling and Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 87, Issue 12, Pages 5905-5913

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac5040743

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fucosylation is an important feature of protein N-glycosylation as it has been reported to influence the efficacy of therapeutic proteins and as a potential disease biomarker. A common approach for characterizing protein N-glycans is to analyze the native glycans via tandem mass spectrometry (MS). However, tandem MS analysis of native N-glycans typically results in proton migration, which in turn leads to fucose residue migration from the glycan core to the antenna and vice versa. This phenomenon ultimately leads to ambiguous assignment of N-glycan fucosylation. Although the use of specific fucosidases has been successfully employed for assigning fucosylation, such strategies are often too cumber-some, expensive, and time-consuming for routine N-glycan analysis. As an alternative, we explore the influence of labeling N-glycans with procainamide hydrochloride to inhibit fucose migration during tandem MS analysis. The labeled N-glycan pool was separated and analyzed using ultraperformance liquid chromatography and a hydrophobic interaction liquid chromatography column coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (UPLC-HILIC-QTOF-MS). The observation of the m/z 587.3 core fucose diagnostic peak corresponding to [GlcNAc + Fucose + Procainamide + H](+) in the tandem MS data of fucosylated N-glycans rapidly verifies core fucosylation while its absence signifies antennae fucosylation. This unique approach is here validated with human IgG (for core fucosylation) and human alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein (for antenna fucosylation). We further present a useful application toward the rapid verification of fucosylation types in a therapeutic protein (Rituximab).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available