4.6 Article

Association between overweight/obesity and increased risk of periodontitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 733-739

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12421

Keywords

body mass index; obesity; overweight; periodontitis

Funding

  1. Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme
  2. UK Clinical Research Collaboration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo investigate periodontitis as a co-morbidity of overweight/obesity in an age-matched sample of periodontitis cases or periodontally healthy controls. MethodsParticipants were periodontally assessed using whole mouth clinical periodontal measures. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio for diagnosis of periodontitis when body mass index (kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25-29.99kg/m(2), or obese BMI30kg/m(2)) were the explanatory variables. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated of all possible BMI (kg/m(2)) cut-off points discriminating individuals for diagnosis of periodontitis. ResultsThe study comprised 286 participants. BMI showed a dose-response association with increased odds (1.12 per increase of 1kg/m(2), 95% CI 1.05-1.20, p=0.001) of being a case compared to a control independent of gender, ethnicity, smoking status and dental plaque level. Similarly overweight/obese were independently associated with increased odds of diagnosis of periodontitis for overweight (OR=2.56, 95% CI 1.210-5.400, p=0.014) and for obese (OR=3.11, 95% CI 1.052-6.481, p=0.015) compared to normal weight individuals. The ROC curve analysis confirmed diagnosis of periodontitis was 1.6 times more likely in an individual with the BMI24.32kg/m(2). ConclusionsOverweight/obese individuals are more likely to suffer from periodontitis compared to normal weight individuals in this case-control sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available