4.7 Article

MicroRNA profiling of rhesus macaque embryonic stem cells

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-276

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. 973 program of China [2011CBA01101]
  2. National 863 project of China [2006AA02A116, 2006AA02A101]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology [2009ZX09501-028]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX1-YW-R-34]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871343]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in embryonic stem cell (ESC) self-renewal and pluripotency. Numerous studies have revealed human and mouse ESC miRNA profiles. As a model for human-related study, the rhesus macaque is ideal for delineating the regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs in ESCs. However, studies on rhesus macaque (r) ESCs are lacking due to limited rESC availability and a need for systematic analyses of fundamental rESC characteristics. Results: We established three rESC lines and profiled microRNA using Solexa sequencing resulting in 304 known and 66 novel miRNAs. MiRNA profiles were highly conserved between rESC lines and predicted target genes were significantly enriched in differentiation pathways. Further analysis of the miRNA-target network indicated that gene expression regulated by miRNAs was negatively correlated to their evolutionary rate in rESCs. Moreover, a cross-species comparison revealed an overall conservation of miRNA expression patterns between human, mouse and rhesus macaque ESCs. However, we identified three miRNA clusters (miR-467, the miRNA cluster in the imprinted Dlk1-Dio3 region and C19MC) that showed clear interspecies differences. Conclusions: rESCs share a unique miRNA set that may play critical roles in self-renewal and pluripotency. MiRNA expression patterns are generally conserved between species. However, species and/or lineage specific miRNA regulation changed during evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available