4.7 Article

Charge-induced dipole vs. relativistically enhanced covalent interactions in Ar-tagged Au-Ag tetramers and pentamers

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4923255

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fritz-Haber Institute of the Max-Planck Society
  2. Cluster of Excellence: Unifying Concepts in Catalysis
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  4. DFG [SCHA 885/10-2, FI 893/3]
  5. Merck'sche Gesellschaft fur Kunst und Wissenschaft e. V.
  6. EPSRC [EP/K000128/1, EP/L000202]
  7. Office of Science and Technology through EPSRC's High End Computing Programme
  8. EPSRC [EP/K000128/1, EP/L000202/1, EP/K000233/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K000233/1, EP/K000128/1, EP/L000202/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vibrational spectra of AunAgm+center dot Ar-k (n + m = 4, 5; k = 1-4) clusters are determined by far-infrared resonant multiple photon dissociation spectroscopy in the range (nu) over tilde = 100-250 cm(-1). The experimental spectra are assigned using density functional theory for geometries obtained by the Birmingham cluster genetic algorithm. Putative global minimum candidates of the Ar complexes are generated by adding Ar atoms to the AunAgm+ low energy isomers and subsequent local optimization. Differential Ar binding energies indicate exceptionally strong Au-Ar bonds in Au-rich clusters, leading to fundamental changes to the IR spectra. The stronger Ar binding is attributed to a relativistically enhanced covalent character of the Au-Ar bond, while in Au-rich species charge-induced dipole interactions overcompensate the relativistic affinity to Au. Moreover, not only the absolute composition but also the topologies are essential in the description of Ar binding to a certain cluster. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available