4.5 Article

Biased assembly of the nuclear pore complex is required for somatic and germline nuclear differentiation in Tetrahymena

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 128, Issue 9, Pages 1812-1823

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.167353

Keywords

Ciliates; Live CLEM; Live cell imaging; Nuclear differentiation; Nuclear envelope; Nuclear pore complex

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [23128514, 24570227, 26440098, 26251037, 21370094, 23114724, 25116006, 26291007]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26440098, 23128514, 24570227, 26251037, 25116006, 21370094, 26116511, 26291007] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ciliates have two functionally distinct nuclei, a somatic macronucleus (MAC) and a germline micronucleus (MIC) that develop from daughter nuclei of the last postzygotic division (PZD) during the sexual process of conjugation. Understanding this nuclear dimorphism is a central issue in ciliate biology. We show, by live-cell imaging of Tetrahymena, that biased assembly of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) occurs immediately after the last PZD, which generates anterior-posterior polarized nuclei: MAC-specific NPCs assemble in anterior presumptive MACs but not in posterior presumptive MICs. MAC-specific NPC assembly in the anterior nuclei occurs much earlier than transport of Twi1p, which is required for MAC genome rearrangement. Correlative light-electron microscopy shows that addition of new nuclear envelope (NE) precursors occurs through the formation of domains of redundant NE, where the outer double membrane contains the newly assembled NPCs. Nocodazole inhibition of the second PZD results in assembly of MAC-specific NPCs in the division-failed zygotic nuclei, leading to failure of MIC differentiation. Our findings demonstrate that NPC type switching has a crucial role in the establishment of nuclear differentiation in ciliates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available