4.5 Article

N-cadherin negatively regulates collective Drosophila glial migration through actin cytoskeleton remodeling

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages 900-912

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.157974

Keywords

Collective migration; glial cells; N-cadherin; actin cytoskeleton; Drosophila

Categories

Funding

  1. INSERM grant
  2. CNRS grant
  3. UDS grant
  4. Hopital de Strasbourg grant
  5. ARC grant
  6. INCA grant
  7. Indo-French Center for the Promotion of Advanced Research (CEFIPRA) grant
  8. ANR grant
  9. AFM fellowship
  10. ARC fellowship
  11. CEFIPRA fellowship
  12. French state fund through the ANR labex
  13. Company of Biologist

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell migration is an essential and highly regulated process. During development, glia cells and neurons migrate over long distances in most cases collectively - to reach their final destination and build the sophisticated architecture of the nervous system, the most complex tissue of the body. Collective migration is highly stereotyped and efficient, defects in the process leading to severe human diseases that include mental retardation. This dynamic process entails extensive cell communication and coordination, hence, the real challenge is to analyze it in the entire organism and at cellular resolution. We here investigate the impact of the N-cadherin adhesion molecule on collective glial migration, by using the Drosophila developing wing and cell-type specific manipulation of gene expression. We show that N-cadherin timely accumulates in glial cells and that its levels affect migration efficiency. N-cadherin works as a molecular brake in a dosage-dependent manner, by negatively controlling actin nucleation and cytoskeleton remodeling through alpha/beta catenins. This is the first in vivo evidence for N-cadherin negatively and cell autonomously controlling collective migration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available