4.5 Article

Brood parasitism disproportionately increases nest provisioning and helper recruitment in a cooperatively breeding bird

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 12, Pages 2279-2286

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-011-1238-7

Keywords

Agelaioides badius; Brood parasitism; Cooperative breeding; Molothrus; Nest provisioning

Funding

  1. University of Buenos Aires
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obligate avian brood parasites lay their eggs in nests of other species (hosts), which raise parasitic young. Parasitic nestlings are likely to influence host's parental behaviours as they typically beg for food more vigorously than young host for a given hunger level. However, few studies have tested this idea, with conflicting results. These prior studies were largely limited to biparental hosts, but little is known about the effect of brood parasitism on parental behaviours in hosts that breed cooperatively. We followed a multimodel approach to examine the effect of brood parasitism on nest provisioning and helper recruitment in the baywing (Agelaioides badius), a cooperative breeder parasitised by screaming (Molothrus rufoaxillaris) and shiny (Molothrus bonariensis) cowbirds. Multimodel inference results indicated that feeding visits increased with nestling age, cooperative group size and number of cowbird nestlings in the brood. Brood size had little influence on feeding visits, which further suggests that baywings adjusted their provisioning effort in response to cowbird parasitism. In addition, nests parasitised artificially with shiny cowbird eggs or hatchlings recruited more helpers than unmanipulated nests having only host or screaming cowbird young. Our results provide novel evidence that brood parasitism and cooperative breeding interact in determining the levels of nest provisioning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available