4.4 Article

In vitro and in vivo pathogenicity of Salmonella enteritidis clinical strains isolated from North America

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 193, Issue 11, Pages 811-821

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-011-0719-4

Keywords

Salmonella enteritidis; Motility; Biofilm; Virulence

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [NO1-AI-30055]
  2. College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salmonella enteritidis is a leading cause of food-borne gastroenteritis worldwide. In this study, 48 strains of S. enteritidis isolated from clinical cases of salmonellosis in North America were tested for their virulence-associated traits including cell invasiveness, biofilm, motility, presence of a virulence plasmid, and virulence in orally challenged mice. The majority of strains exhibited high invasiveness (n = 45), whereas only few strains (n = 3) exhibited low invasiveness. All low-invasive strains (100%, 3/3) were biofilm negative, whereas the distribution of biofilm positive and negative phenotypes among high-invasive strains was 53.4% (24/45) and 46.6% (21/45), respectively. The in vitro cell invasiveness was not associated with biofilm formation (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.23) or the presence of a spvB gene, a marker for the virulence-associated plasmid (Fisher's exact test, P = 1). There was no correlation between cell invasiveness and motility (Spearman's rank test, r = -0.15; P = 0.27). Virulence testing in orally challenged mice revealed that the low-invasive strains were as virulent as high-invasive strains, indicating that in vitro cell invasiveness did not correlate with in vivo virulence. In conclusion, we show that despite phenotypic diversity among clinical strains of S. enteritidis, the majority of strains are highly invasive in vitro and in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available