4.7 Article

Souring in low-temperature surface facilities of two high-temperature Argentinian oil fields

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 18, Pages 8017-8029

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-5843-z

Keywords

Sulfide; Sulfate-reducing bacteria; Souring; Oil field; Nitrate; Microbial community

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Industrial Research Chair Award
  2. Genome Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Produced waters from the Barrancas and Chihuido de la Salina (CHLS) fields in Argentina had higher concentrations of sulfate than were found in the injection waters, suggesting that the formation waters in these reservoirs had a high sulfate concentration and that sulfate-reducing bacteria were inactive downhole. Incubation of produced waters with produced oil gave rapid reduction of sulfate to sulfide (souring) at 37 A degrees C, some at 60 A degrees C, but none at 80 A degrees C. Alkylbenzenes and alkanes served as electron donor, especially in incubations with CHLS oil. Dilution with water to decrease the ionic strength or addition of inorganic phosphate did not increase souring at 37 or 60 A degrees C. These results indicate that souring in these reservoirs is limited by the reservoir temperature (80 A degrees C for the Barrancas and 65-70 A degrees C for the CHLS field) and that souring may accelerate in surface facilities where the oil-water mixture cools. As a result, significant sulfide concentrations are present in these surface facilities. The activity and presence of chemolithotrophic Gammaproteobacteria of the genus Thiomicrospira, which represented 85 % of the microbial community in a water plant in the Barrancas field, indicated reoxidation of sulfide and sulfur to sulfate. The presence of these bacteria offers potential for souring control by microbial oxidation in aboveground facilities, provided that formation of corrosive sulfur can be avoided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available