4.5 Article

On the Characterization of a Non-Newtonian Blood Analog and Its Response to Pulsatile Flow Downstream of a Simplified Stenosis

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 97-109

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0893-4

Keywords

Flow separation; Non-Newtonian fluid; Transitional flow; Turbulent stresses; Viscosity; Xanthan gum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Particle image velocimetry (PIV) was used to investigate the influence of a non-Newtonian blood analog of aqueous xanthan gum on flow separation in laminar and transitional environments and in both steady and pulsatile flow. Initial steady pressure drop measurements in laminar and transitional flow for a Newtonian analog showed an extension of laminar behavior to Reynolds number (Re) similar to 2900 for the non-Newtonian case. On a macroscale level, this showed good agreement with porcine blood. Subsequently, PIV was used to measure flow patterns and turbulent statistics downstream of an axisymmetric stenosis in the aqueous xanthan gum solution and for a Newtonian analog at Re similar to 520 and Re similar to 1250. The recirculation length for the non-Newtonian case was reduced at Re similar to 520 resultant from increased viscosity at low shear strain rates. At Re similar to 1250, peak turbulent intensities and turbulent shear stresses were dampened by the non-Newtonian fluid in close proximity to the blockage outlet. Although the non-Newtonian case's recirculation length was increased at peak pulsatile flow, turbulent shear stress was found to be elevated for the Newtonian case downstream from the blockage, suggesting shear layer fragmentation and radial transport. Our findings conclude that the xanthan gum elastic polymer prolongs flow stabilization, which in turn emphasizes the importance of non-Newtonian blood characteristics on the resulting flow patterns in such cardiovascular environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available