4.5 Article

Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Aortic Coarctation: Validation with In Vivo Measurements

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 669-681

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0715-0

Keywords

Pressure gradient; CFD; Reduced-order models; Coarctation of aorta; Non-invasive; PC-MRI

Funding

  1. Sectorial Operational Programme Human Resources Development (SOP HRD)
  2. European Social Fund
  3. Romanian Government [POSDRU/88/1.5/S/76945]
  4. European Union [FP7 - 248421]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a CFD-based approach for the non-invasive hemodynamic assessment of pre- and post-operative coarctation of aorta (CoA) patients. Under our approach, the pressure gradient across the coarctation is determined from computational modeling based on physiological principles, medical imaging data, and routine non-invasive clinical measurements. The main constituents of our approach are a reduced-order model for computing blood flow in patient-specific aortic geometries, a parameter estimation procedure for determining patient-specific boundary conditions and vessel wall parameters from non-invasive measurements, and a comprehensive pressure-drop formulation coupled with the overall reduced-order model. The proposed CFD-based algorithm is fully automatic, requiring no iterative tuning procedures for matching the computed results to observed patient data, and requires approximately 6-8 min of computation time on a standard personal computer (Intel Core2 Duo CPU, 3.06 GHz), thus making it feasible for use in a clinical setting. The initial validation studies for the pressure-drop computations have been performed on four patient datasets with native or recurrent coarctation, by comparing the results with the invasively measured peak pressure gradients recorded during routine cardiac catheterization procedure. The preliminary results are promising, with a mean absolute error of less than 2 mmHg in all the patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available