4.5 Article

TAT Is Not Capable of Transcellular Delivery Across an Intact Endothelial Monolayer In Vitro

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 394-401

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0144-x

Keywords

Cell-penetrating peptide; TAT peptide; Endothelial barrier; Transcellular delivery

Funding

  1. Brain Trust
  2. National Institutes of Health [R21 MH080024]
  3. National Science Foundation [CBET-0853946]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R21MH080024] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing delivery vehicles capable of penetrating cell barriers is critical for drug delivery to the brain due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are one potential solution since they can enter cells; however, it is unclear whether CPPs can pass through cell barriers. In this study, the ability of the TAT CPP to cross an endothelial barrier without disrupting the integrity of its tight junctions was investigated. Endothelial cell monolayers (bEnd.3) were exposed to the TAT peptide, and cell integrity was quantified by zona occludens-1 immunofluorescence, trans-endothelial electrical resistance, and hydraulic conductivity. None of these parameters were significantly altered following exposure to TAT. To evaluate the passage of TAT through the monolayer, the permeability of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-TAT fusion protein was not significantly different from the permeability of GFP or fluorescent dextrans of similar sizes. Furthermore, GFP-TAT was unable to significantly transduce astrocytes on the opposite side of the bEnd.3 monolayer. We conclude, therefore, that although TAT may not be an efficient delivery vehicle for trans-BBB delivery, our TAT construct may have utility in delivering therapeutic cargos to endothelial cells or to the brain parenchyma after BBB disruption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available