4.8 Article

Analysis of hydrazine in drinldng water by isotope dilution gas chromatography/tandem, mass spectrometry with derivatization and liquid-liquid extraction

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 80, Issue 14, Pages 5449-5453

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac702536d

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new isotope dilution gas chromatography/chemical ionization/tandem mass spectrometric method was developed for the analysis of carcinogenic hydrazine in drinking water. The sample preparation was performed by using the optimized derivatization and multiple liquid-liquid extraction techniques. Using the direct aqueous-phase derivatization with acetone, hydrazine and isotopically labeled hydrazine-N-15(2) used as the surrogate standard formed acetone azine and acetone azine-N-15(2), respectively. These derivatives were then extracted with dichloromethane. Prior to analysis using methanol as the chemical ionization reagent gas, the extract was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, concentrated through evaporation, and then fortified with isotopically labeled N-nitrosodimethylamine-d(6) used as the internal standard to quantify the extracted acetone azine-N-15(2). The extracted acetone azine was quantified against the extracted acetone azine-N-15(2). The isotope dilution standard calibration curve resulted in a linear regression correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. The obtained method detection limit was 0.70 ng/L for hydrazine in reagent water samples, fortified at a concentration of 1.0 ng/L. For reagent water samples fortified at a concentration of 20.0 ng/L, the mean recoveries were 102% with a relative standard deviation of 13.7% for hydrazine and 106% with a relative standard deviation of 12.5% for hydrazine-N-15(2). Hydrazine at 0.5-2.6 ng/L was detected in 7 out of 13 chloraminated drinking water samples but was not detected in the rest of the chloraminated drinking water samples and the studied chlorinated drinking water sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available