4.6 Article

Clarithromycin for stable coronary heart disease increases all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and cerebrovascular morbidity over 10 years in the CLARICOR randomised, blinded clinical trial

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 459-465

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.020

Keywords

Clarithromycin; Stable coronary heart disease; Cardiovascular mortality; Adverse events; Adverse effects; Statin

Funding

  1. Danish Heart Foundation [01-1-5-21-22894, 99-2-5-103-22773, 99-1-5-87-22712, 97-2-5-70-22537]
  2. Copenhagen Hospital Corporation
  3. Danish Research Council [9702122, 22-00-0261]
  4. Pharmacy Foundation [HPN/ld/71-97]
  5. Copenhagen Trial Unit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The CLARICOR trial reported that clarithromycin compared with placebo increased all-cause mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease. This study investigates the effects of clarithromycin versus placebo during 10 years follow up. Methods: The CLARICOR trial is a randomised, placebo-controlled trial including 4373 patients with stable coronary heart disease. The interventions were 2weeks of clarithromycin 500 mg a day versus placebo. 10 year follow up was performed through Danish public registers and analysed with Cox regression. Results: Clarithromycin increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.21) and cerebrovascular disease during 10 years (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.38). The increased mortality and morbidity were restricted to patients not on statin at entry (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.04-1.31, and HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.50). The assumption of constant HR during the 10 years was violated for cardiovascular death (P = 0.01) and cardiovascular death outside hospital (P < 0.0005). Analyses of the effects over time showed that clarithromycin increased cardiovascular mortality during the first three years (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.09-1.84) due to increased cardiovascular mortality outside hospital in patients not on statin (HR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.60-3.50). During the last 4 years, cardiovascular death outside hospital was lower in the clarithromycin group (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Conclusion: Clarithromycin increased mortality due to cardiovascular death outside hospital and cerebrovascular morbidity in patients with stable coronary heart disease who were not on statin. The increased cardiovascular mortality was years later compensated, likely through frailty attrition. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

Vaccines to prevent COVID-19: A living systematic review with Trial Sequential Analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Steven Kwasi Korang, Elena Von Rohden, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Giok Ong, Owen Ngalamika, Faiza Siddiqui, Sophie Juul, Emil Eik Nielsen, Joshua Buron Feinberg, Johanne Juul Petersen, Christian Legart, Afoke Kokogho, Mathias Maagaard, Sarah Klingenberg, Lehana Thabane, Ariel Bardach, Agustin Ciapponi, Allan Randrup Thomsen, Janus C. Jakobsen, Christian Gluud

Summary: This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines through analyses of randomized clinical trials. The findings suggest that all included vaccines are effective in preventing COVID-19, with mRNA vaccines being most effective in prevention and viral vector vaccines being most effective in reducing mortality. However, further trials and longer follow-up are needed to better understand the safety profile of these vaccines.

PLOS ONE (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Methylphenidate denied access to the WHO List of Essential Medicines for the second time

Johanne Pereira Ribeiro, Charlotte Lunde, Christian Gluud, Erik Simonsen, Ole Jakob Storebo

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Article Psychiatry

Family-based cognitive behavioural therapy versus family-based relaxation therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a randomised clinical trial (the TECTO trial)

Anne Katrine Pagsberg, Camilla Uhre, Valdemar Uhre, Linea Pretzmann, Sofie Heidenheim Christensen, Christine Thoustrup, Iben Clemmesen, Amanda Aaen Gudmandsen, Nicoline Locke Jepsen Korsbjerg, Anna-Rosa Cecilie Mora-Jensen, Melanie Ritter, Emilie D. Thorsen, Klara Sofie Vangstrup Halberg, Birgitte Bugge, Nina Staal, Helga Kristensen Ingstrup, Birgitte Borgbjerg Moltke, Anne Murphy Kloster, Pernille Juul Zoega, Marie Sommer Mikkelsen, Gitte Sommer Harboe, Katrin Frimann Larsen, Line Katrine Harder Clemmesen, Jane Lindschou, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Janus Engstrom, Christian Gluud, Hartwig Roman Siebner, Per Hove Thomsen, Katja Hybel, Frank Verhulst, Pia Jeppesen, Jens Richardt Mollegaard Jepsen, Signe Vangkilde, Markus Harboe Olsen, Julie Hagstrom, Nicole Nadine Lonfeldt, Kerstin Jessica Plessen

Summary: This study aims to compare the benefits and harms of family-based cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and family-based psychoeducation and relaxation training (FPRT) in youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The trial is designed to reduce bias and includes follow-up assessments to evaluate the outcomes of the participants. The study is a randomized clinical trial with approximately 128 participants, with equal numbers assigned to the experimental intervention (FCBT) and the control intervention (FPRT).

BMC PSYCHIATRY (2022)

Article Critical Care Medicine

Long-term outcomes of dexamethasone 12 mg versus 6 mg in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia

Anders Granholm, Maj-Brit Norregaard Kjaer, Marie Warrer Munch, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Maria Cronhjort, Rebecka Rubenson Wahlin, Stephan M. Jakob, Luca Cioccari, Gitte Kingo Vesterlund, Tine Sylvest Meyhoff, Marie Helleberg, Morten Hylander Moller, Thomas Benfield, Balasubramanian Venkatesh, Naomi E. Hammond, Sharon Micallef, Abhinav Bassi, Oommen John, Vivekanand Jha, Klaus Tjelle Kristiansen, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Vibeke Lind Jorgensen, Margit Smitt, Morten H. Bestle, Anne Sofie Andreasen, Lone Musaeus Poulsen, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Anne Craveiro Brochner, Thomas Strom, Anders Moller, Mohd Saif Khan, Ajay Padmanaban, Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia, Sanjith Saseedharan, Kapil Borawake, Farhad Kapadia, Subhal Dixit, Rajesh Chawla, Urvi Shukla, Pravin Amin, Michelle S. Chew, Christian Aage Wamberg, Neeta Bose, Mehul S. Shah, Iben S. Darfelt, Christian Gluud, Theis Lange, Anders Perner

Summary: Among patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia, the use of dexamethasone 12 mg compared to 6 mg did not result in statistically significant improvements in mortality or health-related quality of life at 180 days, but the results suggest potential benefit from the higher dose.

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE (2022)

Editorial Material Clinical Neurology

Interventions for Altering Blood Pressure in People With Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Mathias Maagaard, William K. Karlsson, Christian Ovesen, Christian Gluud, Janus C. Jakobsen

STROKE (2022)

Article Anesthesiology

Goal directed fluid removal with furosemide versus placebo in intensive care patients with fluid overload: A trial protocol for a randomised, blinded trial (GODIF trial)

Sine Wichmann, Theis S. Itenov, Rasmus E. Berthelsen, Theis Lange, Anders Perner, Christian Gluud, Pia Lawson-Smith, Lars Nebrich, Jorgen Wiis, Anne C. Brochner, Thomas Hildebrandt, Meike T. Behzadi, Kristian Strand, Finn H. Andersen, Thomas Strom, Mikko Jarvisalo, Kjeld A. J. Damgaard, Marianne L. Vang, Rebecka R. Wahlin, Martin Sigurdsson, Katrin M. Thormar, Marlies Ostermann, Frederik Keus, Morten H. Bestle

Summary: The GODIF trial aims to evaluate the benefits and harms of fluid removal with furosemide in ICU patients with fluid overload. The trial will use a randomised, blinded, stratified, parallel-group design and aims to achieve a neutral fluid balance. The primary outcome is the number of days alive and out of hospital within 90 days after randomisation.

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2022)

Correction Psychiatry

Family-based cognitive behavioural therapy versus family-based relaxation therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a randomised clinical trial (the TECTO trial) (vol 22, 204, 2022)

Anne Katrine Pagsberg, Camilla Uhre, Valdemar Uhre, Linea Pretzmann, Sofie Heidenheim Christensen, Christine Thoustrup, Iben Clemmesen, Amanda Aaen Gudmandsen, Nicoline Locke Jepsen Korsbjerg, Anna-Rosa Cecilie Mora-Jensen, Melanie Ritter, Emilie D. Thorsen, Klara Sofie Vangstrup Halberg, Birgitte Bugge, Nina Staal, Helga Kristensen Ingstrup, Birgitte Borgbjerg Moltke, Anne Murphy Kloster, Pernille Juul Zoega, Marie Sommer Mikkelsen, Gitte Sommer Harboe, Katrin Frimann Larsen, Line Katrine Harder Clemmensen, Jane Lindschou, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Janus Engstrom, Christian Gluud, Hartwig Roman Siebner, Per Hove Thomsen, Katja Hybel, Frank Verhulst, Pia Jeppesen, Jens Richardt Mollegaard Jepsen, Signe Vangkilde, Markus Harboe Olsen, Julie Hagstrom, Nicole Nadine Lonfeldt, Kerstin Jessica Plessen

BMC PSYCHIATRY (2022)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Aluminium adjuvants versus placebo or no intervention in vaccine randomised clinical trials: a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Sara Russo Krauss, Marija Barbateskovic, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Snezana Djurisic, Sesilje Bondo Petersen, Mette Kenfelt, De Zhao Kong, Janus C. Jakobsen, Christian Gluud

Summary: Aluminium adjuvants may not have significant benefits compared to placebo or no intervention in human vaccine development, and may increase the risk of adverse events, based on evidence of very low certainty. More high-quality studies are needed to determine the efficacy of aluminium adjuvants.

BMJ OPEN (2022)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Anticoagulants for thrombosis prophylaxis in acutely ill patients admitted to hospital: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Ruben J. Eck, Tessa Elling, Alex J. Sutton, Jorn Wetterslev, Christian Gluud, Iwan C. C. van der Horst, Reinold O. B. Gans, Karina Meijer, Frederik Keus

Summary: This study assessed the benefits and harms of different types and doses of anticoagulant drugs for preventing venous thromboembolism in acutely ill patients admitted to the hospital. The results suggest that intermediate dose low-molecular-weight heparin appears to provide the best balance of benefits and harms, while unfractionated heparin and direct oral anticoagulants have the least favorable profile. However, caution should be exercised in interpreting these findings due to the generally low quality of evidence.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2022)

Article Anesthesiology

Goal-directed fluid removal with furosemide versus placebo in intensive care patients with fluid overload: A randomised, blinded trial (GODIF trial-First version)

Sine Wichmann, Martin Schonemann-Lund, Anders Perner, Theis S. Itenov, Theis Lange, Christian Gluud, Rasmus E. Berthelsen, Anne C. Brochner, Jorgen Wiis, Morten H. Bestle

Summary: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of diuretics on fluid overload in ICU patients. The results showed that diuretics did not have a significant impact on the number of days alive and out of hospital at 90 days.

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2023)

Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

Cannabinoids versus placebo for pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Jehad Barakji, Steven Kwasi Korang, Joshua Feinberg, Mathias Maagaard, Ole Mathiesen, Christian Gluud, Janus Christian Jakobsen

Summary: This study assessed the benefits and harms of cannabinoids in pain patients. The results showed that cannabinoids reduced chronic pain and improved quality of sleep, but the effect sizes were small. However, cannabinoids had no effects on acute pain or cancer pain and increased the risks of non-serious adverse events. The harmful effects of cannabinoids seem to outweigh the potential benefits in pain treatment.

PLOS ONE (2023)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

One-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration and stone extraction versus two-step endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with stone extraction plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with common bile duct stones: a randomised feasibility and pilot clinical trial-the preGallStep trial

Anders Kirkegaard-Klitbo, Daniel Monsted Shabanzadeh, Markus Harboe Olsen, Jane Lindschou, Christian Gluud, Lars Tue Sorensen

Summary: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the one-step approach and the two-step approach in treating common bile duct stones. A total of 150 participants will be randomly assigned to either the one-step approach or the two-step approach. The primary outcome measure is the occurrence of postoperative complications within 90 days.

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES (2023)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a statistical analysis plan for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomized clinical trial

Isak Mazanti Cold, Joshua Buron Feinberg, Axel Brandes, Ulla Davidsen, Ulrik Dixen, Helena Dominguez, Uffe Jakob Ortved Gang, Christian Gluud, Rakin Hadad, Kit Engedal Kristensen, Doan Tuyet van Le, Emil Eik Nielsen, Michael Hecht Olsen, Ole Dyg Pedersen, Ilan Esra Raymond, Ahmad Sajadieh, Anne Merete Boas Soja, Janus Christian Jakobsen

Summary: This study aims to compare strict rate control with lenient rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome is the physical component score of the SF-36 questionnaire. All secondary outcomes will be hypothesis-generating. The analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle and use linear regression for adjustment.

TRIALS (2023)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The risks of adverse events with venlafaxine and mirtazapine versus 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for two separate systematic reviews with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Caroline Kamp Jorgensen, Sophie Juul, Faiza Siddiqui, Mark Abie Horowitz, Joanna Moncrieff, Klaus Munkholm, Michael Pascal Hengartner, Irving Kirsch, Christian Gluud, Janus Christian Jakobsen

Summary: This study aims to assess the risks of adverse events with venlafaxine or mirtazapine in adults with major depressive disorder through systematic reviews. The effects of venlafaxine and mirtazapine will be evaluated separately in two reviews. The assessment of bias risk will be conducted using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2, and clinical significance will be assessed using an eight-step procedure. The results of this study will provide important information for the treatment of major depressive disorder.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Centre for Statistical and Methodological Excellence (CESAME): A Consortium Initiative for Improving Methodology in Randomised Clinical Trials

Caroline Kamp Jorgensen, Markus Harboe Olsen, Niklas Nielsen, Theis Lange, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Lehana Thabane, Laurent Billot, Nadine Binder, Silvio Garattini, Rita Banzi, Jacques Demotes, Elena Biagioli, Eliana Rulli, Guido Bertolini, Giovanni Nattino, Ole Mathiesen, Valter Torri, Christian Gluud, Janus Christian Jakobsen

Summary: The Centre for Statistical and Methodological Excellence (CESAME) aims to improve the accuracy and reliability of clinical trial results by developing standardized methods and guidelines. CESAME's work will benefit patients worldwide in various medical specialties by enhancing the internal and external validity of randomized clinical trials.

HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS (2023)

No Data Available