4.2 Review

A comparison of intranasal corticosteroid, leukotriene receptor antagonist, and topical antihistamine in reducing symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis as assessed through the Rhinitis Severity Score

Journal

ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 5-9

Publisher

OCEAN SIDE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3308

Keywords

Allergic rhinitis; antihistamines; azelastine; budesonide; intranasal corticosteroids; leukotriene receptor antagonists; montelukast

Categories

Funding

  1. Merck
  2. Schering-Plough
  3. GSK
  4. Novartis-Genentech
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Teva

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rhinitis symptom complex consists of rhinorrhea, congestion, itchy mucosa, itchy eyes, and sneezing. Available medications vary in their benefit for each of these symptoms. It was the purpose of this article to compare symptom reduction with three different classes of medications. Montelukast, azelastine, and budesonide were compared to determine the effect on individual, as well as total, symptom scores using the Rhinitis Severity Score (RSS). All three medications were compared with placebo and showed efficacy in prior studies using Balaam's crossover design. The inclusion and exclusion criteria and all procedures were identical for all three studies. In analyzing the data from the RSS questionnaire, we used the procedure PROC MIXED in SAS specific for Balaam's crossover design (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Although all three medications were effective compared with placebo, montelukast had the greatest effect of the three medications on reduction of ocular itching and throat and palate itching. Azelastine's effect was greater than budesonide and montelukast for reduction of rhinorrhea. Systemic medication, montelukast, as expected, provided better relief for symptoms distant from the nasal cavity, and the antihistamine, azelastine, reduced rhinorrhea, more than either montelukast or budesonide. (Allergy Asthma Proc 31:5-9, 201.0; doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3308)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available