Implementation challenges and successes of a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Implementation challenges and successes of a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives
Authors
Keywords
Colorectal cancer screening, Fecal immunochemical testing, PRISM, Screening facilitators, Screening barriers, Centralized screening program
Journal
Implementation Science
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-03-29
DOI
10.1186/s13012-015-0227-z
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- (2013) Evelyn P. Whitlock et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2013) Donald Steinwachs ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- An Automated Intervention With Stepped Increases in Support to Increase Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2013) Beverly B. Green et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: Wisdom from the field
- (2013) Elizabeth A. Rohan et al. CANCER
- Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology: Evidence From Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Oncology Watch Intervention
- (2012) John Bian et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Colonoscopy versus Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Colorectal-Cancer Screening
- (2012) Enrique Quintero et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Determinants of successful implementation of population-based cancer screening programmes
- (2011) Elsebeth Lynge et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- The Benefits Of Health Information Technology: A Review Of The Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results
- (2011) Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review
- (2011) Melissa C Brouwers et al. Implementation Science
- The role of physician reminders in faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening
- (2011) Muhammed Rafay Sameem Siddiqui et al. European Journal of General Practice
- Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review
- (2010) K. G. Shojania et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- When Budgets Are Tight, There Are Better Options Than Colonoscopies For Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2010) Sujha Subramanian et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Use of a clinical decision support system to increase osteoporosis screening
- (2010) Ramona S. DeJesus et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Automated Telephone Calls Improved Completion of Fecal Occult Blood Testing
- (2010) David M. Mosen et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Patient and Physician Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2009) Thomas D. Sequist et al. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Conducting implementation research in community-based primary care: a qualitative study on integrating patient decision support interventions for cancer screening into routine practice
- (2009) Dominick L. Frosch et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Cochrane Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Screening Using the Fecal Occult Blood Test (Hemoccult): An Update
- (2008) Paul Hewitson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology
- (2008) B. Levin et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started