4.8 Article

Colonoscopy versus Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Colorectal-Cancer Screening

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 366, Issue 8, Pages 697-706

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108895

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Asociacion Espanola contra el Cancer (Fundacion Cientifica and Junta de Barcelona)
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI08/90717]
  3. FEDER
  4. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca [2009SGR849]
  5. Obra Social de Kutxa, Diputacion Foral de Gipuzkoa [DFG 07/5]
  6. Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco, EITB-Maratoia [BIO 07/CA/19]
  7. Accion Transversal contra el Cancer del CIBERehd [2008]
  8. Direccion Xeral de Innovacion e Xestion da Saude Publica, Conselleria de Sanidade
  9. Xunta de Galicia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are accepted strategies for colorectal-cancer screening in the average-risk population. METHODS In this randomized, controlled trial involving asymptomatic adults 50 to 69 years of age, we compared one-time colonoscopy in 26,703 subjects with FIT every 2 years in 26,599 subjects. The primary outcome was the rate of death from colorectal cancer at 10 years. This interim report describes rates of participation, diagnostic findings, and occurrence of major complications at completion of the baseline screening. Study outcomes were analyzed in both intention-to-screen and as-screened populations. RESULTS The rate of participation was higher in the FIT group than in the colonoscopy group (34.2% vs. 24.6%, P<0.001). Colorectal cancer was found in 30 subjects (0.1%) in the colonoscopy group and 33 subjects (0.1%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 1.64; P = 0.99). Advanced adenomas were detected in 514 subjects (1.9%) in the colonoscopy group and 231 subjects (0.9%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.69; P<0.001), and nonadvanced adenomas were detected in 1109 subjects (4.2%) in the colonoscopy group and 119 subjects (0.4%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 9.80; 95% CI, 8.10 to 11.85; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Subjects in the FIT group were more likely to participate in screening than were those in the colonoscopy group. On the baseline screening examination, the numbers of subjects in whom colorectal cancer was detected were similar in the two study groups, but more adenomas were identified in the colonoscopy group. (Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00906997.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available