4.8 Review

Economic analysis of a customer-installed energy storage system for both self-saving operation and demand response program participation in South Korea

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 69-83

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.062

Keywords

Energy Storage System (ESS); Demand Response (DR); Reliability DR; Economic DR; Peak shaving; Arbitrage

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20162010103780, 20174030201660]
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20162010103780, 20174030201660]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20162010103780, 20174030201660] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years Energy Storage System (ESS) has become increasingly important, not only for reducing peak customer demand, but also for enhancing grid stability and reliability. In this manner, this paper performs an economic analysis when a customer-installed ESS is used to both reduce their peak demand and participate for grid stability and reliability in the South Korean Demand Response (DR) program. First, current government policies for accelerating the utilization of ESS and compensation rules of the DR program in South Korea are investigated. Then, an optimal operational strategy for ESS is developed to maximize profits from DR program participation while maintaining the ESS self-saving operation (peak shaving and arbitrage). Actual industry demand profiles are used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed operational strategy for ESS. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis is performed by varying the DR program conditions to facilitate ESS participation. Therefore, these suggestions provide an effective guideline to encourage more ESS to participate in DR program in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available