Authors and editors assort on gender and geography in high-rank ecological publications
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Authors and editors assort on gender and geography in high-rank ecological publications
Authors
Keywords
Biogeography, Peer review, Ecology, Social systems, Evolutionary biology, Evolutionary systematics, Scientific publishing, Economic geography
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages e0192481
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2018-02-09
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0192481
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Journals invite too few women to referee
- (2017) Jory Lerback et al. NATURE
- Solving the Productivity and Impact Puzzle: Do Men Outperform Women, or are Metrics Biased?
- (2016) Elissa Z. Cameron et al. BIOSCIENCE
- Like a rolling stone: the dynamic world of animal ecology publishing
- (2016) Kenneth Wilson et al. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY
- Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender
- (2016) Xiao Han T. Zeng et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The Frequency of “Brilliant” and “Genius” in Teaching Evaluations Predicts the Representation of Women and African Americans across Fields
- (2016) Daniel Storage et al. PLoS One
- Not “Pulling up the Ladder”: Women Who Organize Conference Symposia Provide Greater Opportunities for Women to Speak at Conservation Conferences
- (2016) Stephanie Sardelis et al. PLoS One
- Women in evolution - highlighting the changing face of evolutionary biology
- (2015) Maren Wellenreuther et al. Evolutionary Applications
- Gender differences in patterns of authorship do not affect peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
- (2015) Charles W. Fox et al. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
- Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
- (2015) Charles W. Fox et al. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
- Use of double-blind peer review to increase author diversity
- (2014) E. S. Darling CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- The Presence of Female Conveners Correlates with a Higher Proportion of Female Speakers at Scientific Symposia
- (2014) A. Casadevall et al. mBio
- Building Research Capacity in Africa: Equity and Global Health Collaborations
- (2014) Kathryn M. Chu et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management
- (2014) Alyssa H. Cho et al. PeerJ
- Bias in peer review
- (2012) Carole J. Lee et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact
- (2012) Jordi Duch et al. PLoS One
- Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students
- (2012) C. A. Moss-Racusin et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Geographical and taxonomic biases in research on biodiversity in human-modified landscapes
- (2012) Morgan J. Trimble et al. Ecosphere
- To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review
- (2009) Robyn M. Borsuk et al. BIOSCIENCE
- Is There Gender Bias in the Peer Review Process at Journal of Neurophysiology?
- (2009) John A. Lane et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
- Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate
- (2009) David M. Schultz SCIENTOMETRICS
- Conversations in conservation: revealing and dealing with language differences in environmental conflicts
- (2008) Thomas J. Webb et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
- (2007) A BUDDEN et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started