4.4 Article

Fragment-based quantum mechanical calculation of protein-protein binding affinities

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 39, Issue 21, Pages 1617-1628

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.25236

Keywords

protein-protein complex; binding free energy; quantum mechanics; fragmentation method; solvation energy

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0501700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673074, 21761132022, 21703289, 51672176]
  3. Youth Top-Notch Talent Support Program of Shanghai, NYU-ECNU Center for Computational Chemistry at NYU Shanghai
  4. Intergovernmental International Scientific and Technological Cooperation of Shanghai [17520710200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrostatically embedded generalized molecular fractionation with conjugate caps (EE-GMFCC) method has been successfully utilized for efficient linear-scaling quantum mechanical (QM) calculation of protein energies. In this work, we applied the EE-GMFCC method for calculation of binding affinity of Endonuclease colicin-immunity protein complex. The binding free energy changes between the wild-type and mutants of the complex calculated by EE-GMFCC are in good agreement with experimental results. The correlation coefficient (R) between the predicted binding energy changes and experimental values is 0.906 at the B3LYP/6-31G*-D level, based on the snapshot whose binding affinity is closest to the average result from the molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) calculation. The inclusion of the QM effects is important for accurate prediction of protein-protein binding affinities. Moreover, the self-consistent calculation of PB solvation energy is required for accurate calculations of protein-protein binding free energies. This study demonstrates that the EE-GMFCC method is capable of providing reliable prediction of relative binding affinities for protein-protein complexes. (c) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available