Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys: A meta-analysis
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys: A meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-06-29
DOI
10.1111/1365-2664.13229
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Estimating bird detection distances in sound recordings for standardizing detection ranges and distance sampling
- (2018) Kevin Darras et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Autonomous acoustic recorders reveal complex patterns in avian detection probability
- (2017) Sarah J. Thompson et al. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
- Entendiendo la complementariedad de dos métodos de muestreo en el estudio de comunidades de aves de un bosque mesófilo de montaña en temporada reproductiva
- (2017) Omar Suárez-García et al. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad
- Paired sampling standardizes point count data from humans and acoustic recorders
- (2017) Steven L. Van Wilgenburg et al. Avian Conservation and Ecology
- Experimentally derived detection distances from audio recordings and human observers enable integrated analysis of point count data
- (2017) Daniel A. Yip et al. Avian Conservation and Ecology
- Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications
- (2017) Julia Shonfield et al. Avian Conservation and Ecology
- Microphone variability and degradation: implications for monitoring programs employing autonomous recording units
- (2017) Patrick J. Turgeon et al. Avian Conservation and Ecology
- Robust Detection of Environmental Sounds in Binaural Auditory Scenes
- (2017) Ivo Trowitzsch et al. IEEE-ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
- Comparison of acoustic recorders and field observers for monitoring tundra bird communities
- (2017) Skyler T. Vold et al. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
- Measuring sound detection spaces for acoustic animal sampling and monitoring
- (2016) Kevin Darras et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Comparison of point counts and automated acoustic monitoring: detecting birds in a rainforest biodiversity survey
- (2016) Elliot C. Leach et al. EMU
- Counting chirps: acoustic monitoring of cryptic frogs
- (2016) G. John Measey et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Effect of Revisitation Surveys on Detection of Wetland Birds with Different Diel Vocalization Patterns
- (2016) Van T. La et al. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
- Divergent species richness and vocal behavior in avian migratory guilds along an elevational gradient
- (2016) Michael C. McGrann et al. Ecosphere
- Estimating colony sizes of emerging bats using acoustic recordings
- (2016) Laura N. Kloepper et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Using automated recorders and occupancy models to monitor common forest birds across a large geographic region
- (2015) Brett J. Furnas et al. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
- A comparison of point counts with a new acoustic sampling method: a case study of a bird community from the montane forests of Mount Cameroon
- (2015) Ondřej Sedláček et al. OSTRICH
- Reliable detection of audio events in highly noisy environments
- (2015) Pasquale Foggia et al. PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
- Comparisons Between Autonomous Acoustic Recordings and Avian Point Counts in Open Woodland Savanna
- (2015) Renata D. Alquezar et al. Wilson Journal of Ornithology
- Assessing the performance of a semi-automated acoustic monitoring system for primates
- (2015) Stefanie Heinicke et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Bird biodiversity assessments in temperate forest: the value of point count versus acoustic monitoring protocols
- (2015) Brian T. Klingbeil et al. PeerJ
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Reviving common standards in point-count surveys for broad inference across studies
- (2014) Steven M. Matsuoka et al. CONDOR
- Baseline data for automated acoustic monitoring of Orthoptera in a Mediterranean landscape, the Hymettos, Greece
- (2014) Gerlind U. C. Lehmann et al. JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
- Comparison of audio recording system performance for detecting and monitoring songbirds
- (2013) Robert S. Rempel et al. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
- Unmanned Aerial Survey of Elephants
- (2013) Cédric Vermeulen et al. PLoS One
- Calibrating indices of avian density from non-standardized survey data: making the most of a messy situation
- (2013) Péter Sólymos et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- A Review and Inventory of Fixed Autonomous Recorders for Passive Acoustic Monitoring of Marine Mammals
- (2013) Renata Sousa-Lima AQUATIC MAMMALS
- Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds
- (2012) Antonio Celis-Murillo et al. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
- Using extended-duration audio recordings to survey avian species
- (2012) Amy K. Tegeler et al. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
- Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus
- (2011) Daniel T. Blumstein et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Evaluation of an automated recording device for monitoring forest birds
- (2011) Lisa A. Venier et al. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
- Using soundscape recordings to estimate bird species abundance, richness, and composition
- (2009) Antonio Celis-Murillo et al. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
- Humans versus autonomous recording units: a comparison of point-count results
- (2009) Richard L. Hutto et al. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
- Detecting bird sounds in a complex acoustic environment and application to bioacoustic monitoring
- (2009) R. Bardeli et al. PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
- Planning forwards: biodiversity research and monitoring systems for better management
- (2009) Diane L. Haughland et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started