Comparison of point counts and automated acoustic monitoring: detecting birds in a rainforest biodiversity survey
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparison of point counts and automated acoustic monitoring: detecting birds in a rainforest biodiversity survey
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EMU
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages 305-309
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2016-04-05
DOI
10.1071/mu15097
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A comparison of point counts with a new acoustic sampling method: a case study of a bird community from the montane forests of Mount Cameroon
- (2015) Ondřej Sedláček et al. OSTRICH
- Bird biodiversity assessments in temperate forest: the value of point count versus acoustic monitoring protocols
- (2015) Brian T. Klingbeil et al. PeerJ
- Detecting tropical nocturnal birds using automated audio recordings
- (2015) Jennifer L. Goyette et al. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
- Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: Implications for ecosystem function and conservation
- (2014) Tom P. Bregman et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- The Use of Automated Bioacoustic Recorders to Replace Human Wildlife Surveys: An Example Using Nightjars
- (2014) Mieke C. Zwart et al. PLoS One
- Using automated sound recording and analysis to detect bird species-at-risk in southwestern Ontario woodlands
- (2014) Stephen B. Holmes et al. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
- Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness
- (2013) Jason Wimmer et al. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
- Comparison of audio recording system performance for detecting and monitoring songbirds
- (2013) Robert S. Rempel et al. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
- Current Analogues of Future Climate Indicate the Likely Response of a Sensitive Montane Tropical Avifauna to a Warming World
- (2013) Alexander S. Anderson et al. PLoS One
- A practical comparison of manual and autonomous methods for acoustic monitoring
- (2013) Andrew Digby et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Measuring nocturnal seabird activity and status using acoustic recording devices: applications for island restoration
- (2012) Rachel T. Buxton et al. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
- Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds
- (2012) Antonio Celis-Murillo et al. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
- Field test of an affordable, portable, wireless microphone array for spatial monitoring of animal ecology and behaviour
- (2012) Daniel J. Mennill et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Acoustic Monitoring Reveals Congruent Patterns of Territorial Singing Behaviour in Male and Female Tropical Wrens
- (2011) Anneka E. Osmun et al. ETHOLOGY
- Individual distinctiveness in avian vocalizations and the spatial monitoring of behaviour
- (2011) DANIEL J. MENNILL IBIS
- Evaluation of an automated recording device for monitoring forest birds
- (2011) Lisa A. Venier et al. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
- The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation
- (2010) Paola Laiolo BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: A comparison of methods
- (2009) Miguel A. Acevedo et al. Ecological Informatics
- Using soundscape recordings to estimate bird species abundance, richness, and composition
- (2009) Antonio Celis-Murillo et al. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started