4.8 Article

Data-Driven Short-Term Solar Irradiance Forecasting Based on Information of Neighboring Sites

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 66, Issue 12, Pages 9918-9927

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2856199

Keywords

Boosted regression trees; forecasting; solar irradiance; data-driven approaches

Funding

  1. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Research and Development [Y807s61001]
  2. University of Science and Technology Beijing - National Taipei University of Technology Joint Research Program [TW2018008]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [06500078]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Short-term forecasting of solar irradiance at a targeted site with consideration of its time series and measurements at neighboring sites is studied in this paper. A data-driven framework for forecasting solar irradiance based on fusing spatial and temporal information is proposed. In the framework, data-driven approaches including boosted regression trees (BRT), artificial neural network, support vector machine, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator are applied to model spatial dependence among solar irradiance time series thereby to generate forecasts of solar irradiance at the targeted site. A comprehensive comparison among data-driven forecasting models is performed using 30-min averaged data of recent two years. Moreover, benchmarking models including scaled persistence model, autoregressive model, and autoregressive exogenous model are employed to further validate the effectiveness of data-driven forecasting models. Computational results of multiple-steps ahead forecasting demonstrate that the BRT model gives the best performance with the lowest normalized root mean squared error of 18.4%, 24.3%, 27.9%, and 30.6% for forecasting horizons of 30, 60, 90, and 120-min, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available