4.8 Article

The interplay of type I and type II interferons in murine autoimmune cholangitis as a basis for sex-biased autoimmunity

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 1408-1419

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.29524

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK090019]
  2. National Cancer Institute intramural research program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have reported on a murine model of autoimmune cholangitis, generated by altering the AU-rich element (ARE) by deletion of the interferon gamma (IFN-) 3' untranslated region (coined ARE-Del(-/-)), that has striking similarities to human primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with female predominance. Previously, we suggested that the sex bias of autoimmune cholangitis was secondary to intense and sustained type I and II IFN signaling. Based on this thesis, and to define the mechanisms that lead to portal inflammation, we specifically addressed the hypothesis that type I IFNs are the driver of this disease. To accomplish these goals, we crossed ARE-Del(-/-) mice with IFN type I receptor alpha chain (Ifnar1) knockout mice. We report herein that loss of type I IFN receptor signaling in the double construct of ARE-Del(-/-) Ifnar1(-/-) mice dramatically reduces liver pathology and abrogated sex bias. More importantly, female ARE-Del(-/-) mice have an increased number of germinal center (GC) B cells as well as abnormal follicular formation, sites which have been implicated in loss of tolerance. Deletion of type I IFN signaling in ARE-Del(-/-) Ifnar1(-/-) mice corrects these GC abnormalities, including abnormal follicular structure. Conclusion: Our data implicate type I IFN signaling as a necessary component of the sex bias of this murine model of autoimmune cholangitis. Importantly these data suggest that drugs that target the type I IFN signaling pathway would have potential benefit in the earlier stages of PBC. (Hepatology 2018;67:1408-1419)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available