4.7 Article

Sedimentary evidence for enhanced hydrological cycling in response to rapid carbon release during the early Toarcian oceanic anoxic event

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 481, Issue -, Pages 162-170

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.030

Keywords

Toarcian; carbon isotope; hydrological cycling; sedimentology; atmospheric warming

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [12108818, 15108821]
  2. NERC Fellowship [NE/I02089X/1]
  3. Sasakawa Foundation of Great Britain [4883]
  4. Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation [10960/12369]
  5. NERC [NE/I02089X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I02089X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A pronounced excursion in the carbon-isotope composition of biospheric carbon and coeval seawater warming during the early Toarcian (similar to 183 Ma) has been linked to the large-scale transfer of C-12-enriched carbon to the oceans and atmosphere. A European bias in the distribution of available data means that the precise pattern, tempo and global expression of this carbon cycle perturbation, and the associated environmental responses, remain uncertain. Here, we present a new cm-scale terrestrial dominated carbon-isotope record through an expanded lower Toarcian section from Japan that displays a negative excursion pattern similar to marine and terrestrial carbon-isotope records documented from Europe. These new data suggest that C-12-enriched carbon was added to the biosphere in at least one rapid, millennial-scale pulse. Sedimentological analysis indicates a close association between the carbon isotope excursion and high-energy sediment transport and enhanced fluvial discharge. Together, these data support the hypothesis that a sudden strengthening of the global hydrological cycle occurred in direct and immediate response to rapid carbon release and atmospheric warming. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available