EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS

Journal Title
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS

EARTH PLANET SC LETT

ISSN / eISSN
0012-821X / 1385-013X
Aims and Scope
Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) is a leading journal for researchers across the entire Earth and planetary sciences community. It publishes concise, exciting, high-impact articles ("Letters") of broad interest. Its focus is on physical and chemical processes, the evolution and general properties of the Earth and planets - from their deep interiors to their atmospheres. EPSL also includes a Frontiers section, featuring invited high-profile synthesis articles by leading experts on timely topics to bring cutting-edge research to the wider community.
Subject Area

GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS

CiteScore
10.30 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Geophysics Q1 #5/154
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Geochemistry and Petrology Q1 #5/140
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Q1 #6/141
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Space and Planetary Science Q1 #12/101
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS - SCIE Q1
H-index
215
Country/Area of Publication
NETHERLANDS
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Publication Frequency
Semimonthly
Year Publication Started
1966
Annual Article Volume
444
Open Access
NO
Contact
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
The process was tortuous, and the ending was not satisfactory, but it is still worth recording. Submitted in mid-April, returned for major revisions at the end of June, with one positive and one neutral feedback, mainly emphasizing the need to enhance the article's innovation and significance. Made corresponding modifications according to the suggestions of the two reviewers and resubmitted in early August. After half a month of editing, the original two reviewers were invited to review, but reviewer 1 and 2 did not accept the review for over 20 days. Therefore, new experts were invited. Later, it showed a 2+ agreement for review. On October 25, which is today, the review comments were received. Reviewer 1 is still the same as the first review and agreed to accept it. Reviewer 2's review system and email did not show up, so the reason is unclear. The new reviewer 3 believes that the scope of the article is not suitable for EPSL readers, and the opinions are relatively impartial, but also provided some difficult-to-implement suggestions (partially denying the research significance). In the end, the editor suggested transferring to Tectonophysics or Geomorphology through Elsevier, with a one-month deadline to decide. Reflecting on the excitement and anticipation at the beginning of the submission, it is not realistic to pretend that nothing happened when being rejected. The submission experience indeed shows that EPSL requires higher innovation and research perspectives, and I can only blame my limited abilities. Perhaps comforting oneself that the research journey without rejections is incomplete. The road ahead is long, so let's keep going, little research chick.
2022-10-25
The process with the editor is quite fast, taking about 2-3 days. It may go through around 2 editors before reaching the actual chief editor. The duration with the editor is uncertain, as I have waited for about a month and it changed to "under review". However, it may not necessarily mean it is truly under review, as contacting the reviewers can change the status to "under review", but it may take a long time for someone to agree to review it.

Be patient and good luck.
2022-04-29

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation