Automated screening of Papanicolaou tests: A review of the literature
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Automated screening of Papanicolaou tests: A review of the literature
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-03-31
DOI
10.1002/dc.23931
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Evaluation of CellSolutions BestPrep® Automated Thin-Layer Liquid-Based Cytology Papanicolaou Slide Preparation and BestCyte® Cell Sorter Imaging System
- (2014) Agnes Delga et al. ACTA CYTOLOGICA
- Screening for Cervical Cancer Using Automated Analysis of PAP-Smears
- (2014) Ewert Bengtsson et al. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
- MAVARIC – a comparison of automation-assisted and manual cervical screening: a randomised controlled trial
- (2014) HC Kitchener et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System in the Detection of Abnormal Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Practical Experience in Korea
- (2013) Sang Yun Ha et al. ACTA CYTOLOGICA
- Assessment of Manual Workload Limits in Gynecologic Cytology
- (2013) Andrew A. Renshaw et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
- Performance and Reproducibility of Gynecologic Cytology Interpretation Using the FocalPoint System
- (2013) Maíra Degiovani Stein et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
- A validation study of the FocalPoint GS imaging system for gynecologic cytology screening
- (2013) Terence J. Colgan et al. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY
- Increasing Cytotechnologist Workload Above 100 Slides per Day Using the BD FocalPoint GS Imaging System Negatively Affects Screening Performance
- (2012) Angelique W. Levi et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
- Digital Slide Imaging in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Pilot Study
- (2012) Angela M. Wright et al. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE
- Prospective parallel randomized trial of the MultiCyte™ ThinPrep®imaging system: the Scottish experience
- (2012) T. J. Palmer et al. CYTOPATHOLOGY
- American society of cytopathology workload recommendations for automated pap test screening: Developed by the productivity and quality assurance in the era of automated screening task force
- (2012) Tarik M. Elsheikh et al. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
- Concordance Between Original Screening and Final Diagnosis Using Imager vs. Manual Screen of Cervical Liquid-Based Cytology Slides
- (2011) Maria Cristina Pacheco et al. ACTA CYTOLOGICA
- Implementation of FocalPoint GS location-guided imaging system
- (2011) Angelique W. Levi et al. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY
- Increasing cytotechnologist workload above 100 slides per day using the ThinPrep imaging system leads to significant reductions in screening accuracy
- (2010) Tarik M. Elsheikh et al. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY
- Automation-assisted versus manual reading of cervical cytology (MAVARIC): a randomised controlled trial
- (2010) Henry C Kitchener et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS Imaging System
- (2009) David C. Wilbur et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
- Pap smear diagnosis using a hybrid intelligent scheme focusing on genetic algorithm based feature selection and nearest neighbor classification
- (2009) Yannis Marinakis et al. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
- Accuracy of Thinprep Imaging System in detecting atypical glandular cells
- (2009) Yasodah Jayamohan et al. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
- High-risk HPV DNA detected in less than 2% of over 25,000 cytology negative imaged liquid-based Pap test samples from women 30 and older
- (2009) Mona Bansal et al. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
- Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System: Clinical experience in a low risk screening population
- (2008) Jacalyn L. Papillo et al. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started