4.4 Article

In vitro antioxidant and protective effects of corn peptides on ethanol-induced damage in HepG2 cells

Journal

FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 99-110

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2015.1079597

Keywords

Corn peptides; ethanol-induced damage; antioxidant activity; HepG2

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare [201304805]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31201339, 31571772]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Programme of China [2013AA102205]
  4. Twelfth Five-Year National Science and Technology Support Programme of China [2012BAD33B04]
  5. Cultivation Programme of Hundred Talents in the Science and Technology Field in Beijing [Z131110000513026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the effect of corn peptides (CPs) as an antioxidant on ethanol (EtOH)-induced oxidative stress in HepG2 cells, the cells were preincubated with CPs for 4h before treated with EtOH. Methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium and flow cytometry assay were performed to detect the viability of CP-treated HepG2 cells and control cells. The activities of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were determined by corresponding kits, respectively. The results showed that treatment with 300mmol/L EtOH for 24h resulted in a death of around 50% of the HepG2 cells. Pretreatments of appropriate concentrations of CPs (more than 5mg/mL, particularly at 20mg/mL) significantly prevented EtOH-induced cytotoxicity and reduced the increase of ALT, AST, LDH and MDA contents, as well as inhibited the reduction of SOD contents in the HepG2 cells, indicating that CPs protected the cells from oxidative damage induced by EtOH metabolism, and thus had a great application potential in hepatoprotective nutraceuticals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available