4.5 Article

Feasibility Testing of Hydrophobic Carbon Electrodes for Acquisition of Underwater Surface Electromyography Data

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 46, Issue 9, Pages 1397-1405

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-2042-6

Keywords

Carbon black-PDMS; Electrodes; sEMG data; Waterproof

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-15-1-2236]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Underwater surface electromyography (sEMG) signals are especially of interest for rehabilitation and sports medicine applications. Silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) hydrogel electrodes, although the gold standard for sEMG data collection, require waterproofing for underwater applications. Having to apply waterproof tape over electrodes impedes the deployment of sEMG in immersed conditions. As a better alternative for underwater applications, we have developed carbon black/polydimethylsiloxane (CB/PDMS) electrodes for collecting sEMG signals under water. We recruited twenty subjects to collect simultaneous recordings of sEMG signals using Ag/AgCl and CB/PDMS electrodes on biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and tibial anterior muscles. The Ag/AgCl electrodes were covered in waterproof tape, and the CB/ PDMS electrodes were not. We found no differences in sEMG signal amplitudes between both sensors, for the three muscles. Moderate mean correlation between Ag/AgCl and CB/PDMS electrodes was found on the linear envelopes (>= 0.7); correlation was higher for power spectral densities (>= 0.84). Ag/AgCk electrodes performed better in response to noise, whilst the CB/PDMS electrodes were more sensitive to myoelectric activity in triceps and tibialis, and exhibited better response to motion artifacts in the measurements on the triceps and tibialis. Results suggest that sEMG signal collection is possible under water using CB/PDMS electrodes without requiring any waterproof or adhesive tape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available