4.5 Article

Catalytic activity of Ru/La1.6Ba0.4NiO4 perovskite-like catalyst for NO plus CO reaction: Interaction between Ru and La1.6Ba0.4NiO4

Journal

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
Volume 437, Issue -, Pages 37-46

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2017.05.004

Keywords

NO plus CO reaction; Ru; La1.6Ba0.4NiO4 perovskite-like

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences Fund of Heilongjiang Province [B2015009]
  2. Foundation of Educational Commission of Heilongjiang Province of China [11531286]
  3. Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry (Heilongjiang University), Ministry of Education
  4. Harbin science and technology innovation talent fund [RC2016XK015004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the activity of La1.6Ba0.4NiO4 (LBN) and Ru/La1.6Ba0.4NiO4 (Ru/LBN) perovskite-like catalysts was investigated for NO + CO reaction. Meanwhile, Ru/LBN exhibited much higher activity than LBN. The catalysts were fully characterized by means of XRD, elemental analysis, N-2-physisorption, H-2-TPR, XPS, O-2-TPD, NO-TPD and CO-TPD. These results demonstrated that the excellent catalytic performance of Ru/LBN catalyst was associated with the strong interaction between Ru and LBN, leading to enhancing reducibility and mobility of oxygen species and increasing the amount of the surface adsorbed oxygen. In addition, the amount of adsorbed CO and NO increased largely for Ru/LBN. And Ru3+ species on the surface of Ru/LBN was considered as an effective active site for NO + CO reaction. In-situ DRIFTS was used for studying the relationship between catalytic activity and NO, CO adsorption ability, species and sites. The results indicated that the new active species were formed on the surface of Ru/LBN compared with LBN including inorganic carboxylate, monodentate carbonate, Ru-NO, bridged nitrate and nitrite. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available