4.7 Article

Experimental investigation and thermodynamic analysis of CO2 adsorption on activated carbons for cooling system

Journal

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages 290-304

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2016.12.004

Keywords

Activated carbons; CO2 adsorption; Pseudosaturation pressure; Thermodynamic properties; Cooling system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, the adsorption isotherms of CO2 on three commercially available activated carbons are measured for possible application in cooling systems. The adsorption isotherms are measured using a Sievert's type experimental setup at various temperatures from 273 to 358 K. Experimental data of CO2 adsorption isotherms is modelled using Dubinin-Astakhov model. Pseudosaturation pressure of CO2 plays a significant role in the estimation of thermodynamic properties for supercritical gas adsorption, and it is evaluated using adsorption isotherms data. The thermodynamic properties namely isosteric heat of adsorption at surface loading, Gibbs free energy, and entropy are evaluated using classical Clausius-Clapeyron equation and Dubinin-Astakhov model for both subcritical and supercritical phase of CO2 respectively. Adsorbed phase specific heat capacity, entropy, and enthalpy are also estimated. These thermodynamic properties are used for the thermodynamic analysis of CO2-AC based adsorption cooling system. The cooling system performance parameters like specific cooling effect (SCE) and coefficient of performance (COP) are estimated for the driving heat source temperature of 80 degrees C at four cooling temperatures of 0, 5, 10 and 15 degrees C with a fixed adsorption/condenser temperature of 25 degrees C. All the three activated carbons are found suitable for developing CO2-AC based cooling system. The maximum SCE and COP are obtained as 25.87kJ/kg and 0.09 respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available