Uncertainty Quantification Reveals the Importance of Data Variability and Experimental Design Considerations for in Silico Proarrhythmia Risk Assessment
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Uncertainty Quantification Reveals the Importance of Data Variability and Experimental Design Considerations for in Silico Proarrhythmia Risk Assessment
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Frontiers in Physiology
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Online
2017-11-21
DOI
10.3389/fphys.2017.00917
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Optimization of an In silico Cardiac Cell Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Assessment
- (2017) Sara Dutta et al. Frontiers in Physiology
- Estimability Analysis and Optimal Design in Dynamic Multi-scale Models of Cardiac Electrophysiology
- (2016) Matthew S. Shotwell et al. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS
- Uncertainty and variability in models of the cardiac action potential: Can we build trustworthy models?
- (2016) Ross H. Johnstone et al. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
- Uncertainty and variability in computational and mathematical models of cardiac physiology
- (2016) Gary R. Mirams et al. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
- Evolution of strategies to improve preclinical cardiac safety testing
- (2016) Gary Gintant et al. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- A temperature-dependent in silico model of the human ether-à-go-go- related (hERG) gene channel
- (2016) Zhihua Li et al. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS
- An evaluation of 30 clinical drugs against the comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) proposed ion channel panel
- (2016) William J. Crumb et al. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS
- The Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative — Update on progress
- (2016) Thomas Colatsky et al. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS
- Uncertainty quantification of fast sodium current steady-state inactivation for multi-scale models of cardiac electrophysiology
- (2015) Pras Pathmanathan et al. PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte Carlo Analysis inRUsing PackageFME
- (2015) Karline Soetaert et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Solving Differential Equations inR: PackagedeSolve
- (2015) Karline Soetaert et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Experimentally calibrated population of models predicts and explains intersubject variability in cardiac cellular electrophysiology
- (2013) Oliver J. Britton et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Variability in high-throughput ion-channel screening data and consequences for cardiac safety assessment
- (2013) Ryan C. Elkins et al. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS
- Ensuring reliability of safety-critical clinical applications of computational cardiac models
- (2013) Pras Pathmanathan et al. Frontiers in Physiology
- Quantification of repolarization reserve to understand interpatient variability in the response to proarrhythmic drugs: A computational analysis
- (2011) Amrita X. Sarkar et al. HEART RHYTHM
- Simulation of the Undiseased Human Cardiac Ventricular Action Potential: Model Formulation and Experimental Validation
- (2011) Thomas O'Hara et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- Investigating dynamic protocol-dependence of hERG potassium channel inhibition at 37°C: Cisapride versus dofetilide
- (2010) James T. Milnes et al. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS
- Markov models for ion channels: versatility versus identifiability and speed
- (2009) M. Fink et al. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started