Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 174-183
Publisher
Emerald
Online
2017-05-03
DOI
10.1108/ajim-01-2017-0028
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation
- (2017) Mike Thelwall Journal of Informetrics
- A longitudinal study of the bookmarking of library and information science literature in Mendeley
- (2016) Aida Pooladian et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact
- (2015) Lei Wang et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Geographic variation in social media metrics: an analysis of Latin American journal articles
- (2015) Juan Pablo Alperin Aslib Journal of Information Management
- When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals
- (2015) Nabeil Maflahi et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories
- (2015) Ehsan Mohammadi et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations
- (2015) Ehsan Mohammadi et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields
- (2015) Mike Thelwall et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles
- (2015) Mike Thelwall et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications
- (2015) Clara Stegehuis et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Comparison of downloads, citations and readership data for two information systems journals
- (2014) Christian Schlögl et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?
- (2014) Amalia Mas-Bleda et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications
- (2014) Zohreh Zahedi et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- A multidimensional analysis of Aslib proceedings – using everything but the impact factor
- (2014) Stefanie Haustein et al. Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of mendeley readers
- (2014) Mike Thelwall et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
- (2013) Mike Thelwall et al. PLoS One
- Measuring researchers’ use of scholarly information through social bookmarking data: A case study of BibSonomy
- (2012) Ángel Borrego et al. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
- The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age
- (2012) George A. Lozano et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science
- (2012) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation
- (2012) Jian Wang SCIENTOMETRICS
- Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis
- (2011) Ludo Waltman et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement
- (2011) Xuemei Li et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns
- (2009) Carol Tenopir et al. ASLIB PROCEEDINGS
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now