When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 191-199
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2015-01-09
DOI
10.1002/asi.23369
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?
- (2014) Amalia Mas-Bleda et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community
- (2014) Stefanie Haustein et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications
- (2014) Zohreh Zahedi et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication
- (2014) Kim Holmberg et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics
- (2014) Hadas Shema et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows
- (2014) Ehsan Mohammadi et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
- (2013) Mike Thelwall et al. PLoS One
- Social Media Release Increases Dissemination of Original Articles in the Clinical Pain Sciences
- (2013) Heidi G. Allen et al. PLoS One
- Evaluating altmetrics
- (2013) Pardeep Sud et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review
- (2013) Marco Pautasso PLoS Computational Biology
- Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature
- (2013) Stefanie Haustein et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Citations and thehindex of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar
- (2013) Budiman Minasny et al. PeerJ
- The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
- (2013) Bo-Christer Björk et al. Journal of Informetrics
- How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations
- (2012) Xin Shuai et al. PLoS One
- LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: a comparison between Web of Science and Scopus
- (2012) A. Abrizah et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
- (2011) Gunther Eysenbach JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement
- (2011) Xuemei Li et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact
- (2010) Jonathan M. Levitt et al. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT
- National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States
- (2010) Xi Niu et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns
- (2009) Carol Tenopir et al. ASLIB PROCEEDINGS
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started