4.5 Article

Gluconacetobacter sp gel_SEA623-2, bacterial cellulose producing bacterium isolated from citrus fruit juice

Journal

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 314-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.031

Keywords

Gluconacetobacter sp.; gel_SEA623-2; Bacterial cellulose; Citrus; Cosmetic material

Categories

Funding

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ01093402]
  2. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ010934022017] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellulose producing bacterial strain was isolated from citrus fruit juice fungus. The isolated strain was identified as Gluconacetobacter sp. gel_SEA623-2 based on several morphological characteristics, biochemical tests, and 16S rRNA conducted. Culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production by SEA623-2 were screened in static trays. Conditions were extensively optimized by varying the kind of fruit juice, pH, sugar concentration, and temperature for maximum cellulose production. SEA623-2 has a high productive capacity in citrus processing medium, but not in other fruits. The optimal combination of the media constituents for bacterial cellulose production is as follows: 10% citrus juice, 10% sucrose, 1% acetic acid, and 1% ethanol at 30 degrees C, pH 3.5. Bacterial cellulose produced by SEA623-2 has soft physical properties, high tensile strength, and high water retention value. The cellulose produced by the selected bacteria is suitable as a cosmetic and medical material. (c) 2015 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under theCCBY-NC-NDlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available